Analyzing the Enduring Legacy of Love Actually
Though the holiday season has come to an end, the cultural impact of Love Actually continues to resonate. As one of the hallmark modern Christmas movies, its narrative has sparked ongoing discussions about how it has aged within contemporary society. This conversation even extends into the political arena, as evidenced by Kemi Badenoch’s remarks during my interview with her for The Spectator this festive season, where she noted, “there’s actually quite a lot of dark tones to Love Actually.”
Critics argue that beyond its romantic charm, the film’s storylines may have some unsettling elements, with certain plot points veering into the territory of obsession and borderline stalking. Badenoch particularly questioned one of the film’s most iconic scenes, where Hugh Grant, portraying the British Prime Minister, confronts a domineering and bullying U.S. President, played by Billy Bob Thornton. Grant’s character boldly declares, “We may be a small country, but we’re a great one too.”
Badenoch pointed out that in reality, antagonizing the U.S. President could yield significant repercussions. She remarked, “There is a British prime minister who’s messing around and is not doing the foreign policy properly.” The film frames this moment as a triumph of bravery in the face of inappropriate behavior, yet it raises questions about the potential fallout: What would happen after the credits rolled? Would the U.S. President retaliate? How would this affect intelligence cooperation and trade relations?
Such calculations are very much on the minds of officials at Downing Street and Whitehall, especially as Keir Starmer embarks on his inaugural visit to meet the new U.S. President. For No. 10, the successful arrangement of this trip was a substantial relief. There have been many discussions regarding the difficulties a Labour government might face in building rapport with Team Trump.
- Trump’s campaign team expressed outrage over Labour staffers who volunteered to assist the Democrats in the U.S. election.
- Key figures within Trump’s circle criticized Starmer’s choice of Peter Mandelson as the UK ambassador to the U.S., with one even labeling him a “moron.”
Thus, maintaining the status quo of amicable relations through calls and meetings was a welcome achievement. However, the evolving situation in Ukraine has heightened the significance of Starmer’s visit. Initially deemed crucial, the stakes have now escalated as the world looks to see if Starmer can build on Macron’s recent efforts to influence Trump’s stance on the Ukraine conflict, shifting it towards a more palatable position for both Ukrainians and Europeans.
Following Trump’s recent comments labeling Zelensky a dictator, expectations have been tempered regarding how he might approach the situation. Macron’s meeting with Trump earlier this week demonstrated some success, showcasing a meeting of two powerful figures. Despite their differing political ideologies, both share traits of assertiveness and a willingness to speak their minds. Who else could dare interrupt the U.S. President mid-press conference to correct him on Europe’s financial contributions to Ukraine?
Ministers speculate that Starmer will proceed with caution during his visit. “Now is not the time for a Love Actually moment,” remarked one Labour MP. The prevailing strategy seems to lean towards minimizing concern over Trump’s words, however wild or offensive, and instead focusing on tangible actions.
Aides are prepared for potentially awkward interactions, recalling Trump’s history of publicly humiliating UK leaders, even those who politically align more closely with him. Theresa May faced criticism after a public hand-holding moment with Trump, followed by a joint press conference where he disparaged her Brexit plans. Boris Johnson navigated their relationship more smoothly, but it remained a complex dynamic for Downing Street.
Starmer’s Approach to Diplomacy
With Mandelson now officially serving as ambassador, the duo is collaborating closely to foster goodwill with Team Trump. On Wednesday night, Mandelson hosted his inaugural soirée—a celebratory drinks reception in Washington, D.C., where Starmer was announced as the guest of honor.
This approach emphasizes the adage that you can attract more flies with honey than vinegar. There is also a concerted effort to coordinate positive announcements, such as increased defense spending that has garnered praise from U.S. Defense Secretary Peter Hegseth. Reports suggest that Starmer may even consider altering the color of offshore wind turbines to prevent bird collisions, a suggestion that arose following Trump’s concerns during a phone call.
Despite his previous criticisms of Trump while in opposition, Starmer and his ministers are becoming adept at navigating this complex relationship. However, significant political risks loom for Starmer. The public’s enthusiastic response to Hugh Grant’s defiance of the President in Love Actually serves as a reminder that if Trump makes an inflammatory or false remark about the UK government, Starmer could be perceived as subservient, potentially alienating his support base.
If Starmer can effectively engage Trump, the trip could prove valuable. Conversely, a miscalculated visit could lead to backlash on multiple fronts.
Katy Balls is the political editor of The Spectator.
