Concerns Over Rachel Reeves’s Fiscal Strategy
Rachel Reeves’s approach of implementing “pass-fail” fiscal rules has raised significant concerns among economists, who argue that it leaves Britain’s economic policy “entirely exposed” to fluctuations in global markets. This strategy could also divert attention from addressing more pressing economic issues, they warn.
Matthew Oulton, a Research Economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), commented on the situation, stating: “Rachel Reeves has engineered a trap for herself, albeit in difficult circumstances. Attempting to meet rigid, pass-fail fiscal targets by the narrowest of margins is a precarious strategy from the outset.”
Given the current economic climate, the Chancellor is more likely to propose budget cuts in her upcoming Spring Statement rather than holding off until the autumn budget. This shift is anticipated if an updated forecast indicates that she may not meet her fiscal commitments, according to the IFS.
The Treasury has pledged to conduct only one major fiscal event each year. However, the immediate possibility of failing to meet her own targets could compel Reeves to take action sooner than planned. The Chancellor has outlined two self-imposed fiscal rules aimed at stabilizing the public finances:
- First: Day-to-day government spending must be financed through revenue, rather than through borrowing.
- Second: National debt must decrease as a percentage of income by the fiscal year 2028/29.
When the budget was presented in October, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) indicated that Reeves had approximately £9.9 billion of leeway regarding the first rule. However, the upcoming forecast is likely to eliminate this buffer due to rising borrowing costs and sluggish economic growth within the UK, compounded by international factors such as trade tariffs following Donald Trump’s election.
Stay updated with the latest developments by following The i Paper’s live blog.
