Concerns Emerge Over Planned Cuts to Foreign Aid
Planned reductions in foreign aid to facilitate increased defense spending have ignited worries within the Government regarding the challenges of countering Chinese influence in developing nations. On Tuesday, Sir Keir Starmer unveiled a proposal to decrease the aid budget from 0.5 percent to 0.3 percent of the national income to bolster defense expenditures. However, this decision has stirred unease among Cabinet members and Labour MPs.
The i Paper has learned that some high-ranking officials within the Government are apprehensive that such budget cuts could hinder efforts to mitigate Chinese dominance in the so-called “global south.” With reduced funding, there will be fewer resources available to assist developing nations in accessing global finance, as well as less direct support.
“It is self-evident that it is easier to operate effectively in a 0.5 world than in a 0.3,” a Government source remarked. This sentiment reflects broader concerns about international relations and influence.
In a recent statement, Foreign Secretary David Lammy criticized the dramatic cuts to the United States aid budget announced by Donald Trump, labeling them a “big strategic mistake” that would permit “China and others to fill that void.” Ironically, Lammy now supports the UK Government’s decision to reduce its own aid budget.
Senior Labour MP Sarah Champion echoed these concerns, warning that the UK’s adversaries would be “delighted” by the aid cuts and would seek to expand their influence in regions where Britain is withdrawing its support. As the chair of the Commons Development Committee, she stated, “It is no secret that the most significant threats to UK security stem from China, Russia, Iran, and cyber terrorism. MPs have been forewarned about this for over a decade.”
- “China has been strategically cultivating relationships worldwide through its Belt and Road Initiative. While branded as ‘aid,’ it essentially provides infrastructure that is later leased back or financed through loans that utilize Chinese labor.”
- “This has enabled China to gain leverage across the globe with nations that have historically been our allies.”
Champion further emphasized, “Make no mistake, our enemies will be pleased that we are retreating from the development stage, and they will undoubtedly exploit these gaps to our detriment.”
Luke de Pulford, director of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (IPAC) and a colleague of Champion, cautioned that the UK should “observe how cuts to USAid have created a soft power opportunity for China.” He urged vigilance against providing Beijing with opportunities to manipulate other countries, particularly through initiatives like the Belt and Road infrastructure development.
When questioned about whether China would capitalize on the void left by the UK’s aid reductions, the Prime Minister’s official spokesperson stated, “I reject that characterization. The Prime Minister has expressed pride in the overseas development budget and does not take the decision lightly. However, the increase in the defense budget is vital for national security and crucial for safeguarding our borders. As he mentioned, it remains important that we continue to support key areas, such as Gaza and Ukraine.”
Read Next
Starmer shifts to the right to tame Trump
In the Commons, SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn accused the Prime Minister of adhering to “the populist playbook” by cutting foreign aid. “While we support an increase in defense spending, we cannot endorse the populist strategy of slashing foreign aid. This position was also recently agreed upon by the Foreign Secretary, who warned that such cuts would enable China to step in. Why was the Foreign Secretary wrong, and the Prime Minister right?”
